
|
Fired From Seagate, Bridgeulx New CEO’s Arrogance Won’t Make Him Many Friends in Lighting.
“When man is pushed,
tormented, defeated, he has a chance to learn something; he has been
put on his wits, on his manhood, he has gained facts, learned his
ignorance, is cured of the insanity of conceit, has got moderation
and real skill.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson The above quote is typically what your humble
editor will send to someone who gets terminated or demoted in our
industry. Bill Watkins, the new CEO of Bridgelux, could learn from
Ralph Waldo Emerson. In an
interview with the San Jose Mercury News,
Watkins declared that “When
I thought about what I wanted to do ….it's not like I need money."
This
infers that all of us other schmucks in the lighting industry may be
working for a paycheck, but Mr. Watkins is so brilliant and
successful, money doesn’t matter.
It gets worse.
In the interview, for some reason, Mr. Watkins feels
compelled to bring up his childhood.
According to the article, when
Watkins was a child, his father came to regret coaching his Little
League team because his son was so intent on winning.
"My father refused to ever coach me again," Watkins said. "I
would be mad because I'd want the lousy players benched, and he
thought every kid should have the chance to play."
Mr. Watkins is so
intelligent that he had a keen sense of talent at a very early age.
He also had a great sense of the importance of winning at
any cost—people not quite
as talented, be damned. Your
humble editor had the pleasure of coaching teams for both my
son and daughter. We were
quite competitive, yet I knew the real reason we were out there, and
I also wanted the less athletic player to have a meaningful
experience too. It is
interesting that Mr. Watkins tells this story from the perspective
of his childhood. I
wonder if he ever took the time to coach Little League as an adult.
Next he attacked those of us who have brought the
industry to where it is today.
"You have this perfect storm of incumbents who have owned the
market, and then this disruptive technology — and the disruptive
guys are coming after the incumbents to rip their hearts out." Does Mr. Watkins speak for all companies that
have disruptive technologies?
There are many companies with new and unique, and, yes,
disruptive technology.
Some are working within traditional channels, some are not. Many are
doing both. But none have publicly stated that they wish to rip the
incumbent’s hearts out. Who are the incumbents he wishes to attack?
Are they competitors like CREE, Nexxus, and Lighting
Sciences? Are they
conglomerates like GE, Philips, and SYLVANIA?
Are they Luminaire manufacturers like Acuity Brands, Hubbell,
and Cooper? Are they electrical distributors like Graybar and CED?
Are they ESCO’s like Stones River Companies?
Perhaps he is referring to the merged companies of Amtech and
Sylvania Lighting Services. Fortunately, our humble industry is a little
different than storage area from which he reigns. Like it or not,
people matter and relationships will open or close doors. Perhaps Bridgelux will have brilliant award-winning technology. The problem is that those awards are chosen by industry peers. If Bridgelux plans to submit to the 2010 LIGHTFAIR Innovation Awards, Mr. Watkins may be interested to know the selection is made by a committee of lighting professionals. Perhaps he plans to submit to the 2010 IES Annual Conference in Toronto—he’ll have to get his products past the Progress Committee. Maybe he has his eye set on the Edison Awards, from GE. Unfortunately, GE is one of those pesky incumbents, which he loathes. The article talks of a $40 LED lamp in a hardware store TODAY and Mr. Watkins says," At the end of this year, we'll see a $10 bulb." Really! Not even Jim Brodrick, of the DOE, forecasts at $10 bulb this year. At the end of the article, the CEO of
VantagePoint Venture Partners, who lured Mr. Watkins to Bridgelux,
states, “Watkins has the skills and the energy to make
Bridgelux a major player.” He may have the skills and the
energy, but as I read the Mercury News article, he doesn’t have the
disposition. He should have listened to his father.
|
Education Recalls Past Articles Executive Series Careers Lighting Links Legislation People
© copyright 2009.
EdisonReport.Net. All Rights Reserved